Ruling on making an
employment contract for selling goods
Question 1: What do the blessed ‘Ulama
[Islamic scholars] and Muftis [Islamic jurists] state regarding the following
matter: Zayd is getting a job at a shop which sells goods on instalments. The
details of salary are as follows: If he does marketing and contributes to a
sale worth 400,000 in a month, he will receive a salary of 25,000 rupees, and
if the sale is less than it, he will receive a salary of 1,000 rupees for a
sale worth 100,000. Moreover, he will receive the salary in the same ratio if
the sale is less or more than it. Is this job permissible or not?
Note: The employment contract will not be for
“one’s time” but for “one’s work”; there will be no restriction on time.
Moreover, there is also a condition [for the customer] of paying fine if the
instalment is delayed.
Questioner: Muhammad Mohsin (Markaz-ul-Awliya,
Lahore)
بِسْمِ
اللّٰہِ الرَّحْمٰنِ الرَّحِیْمِ
اَلْجَوَابُ بِعَوْنِ الْمَلِکِ
الْوَھَّابِ اَللّٰھُمَّ ھِدَایَۃَ
الْحَقِّ وَالصَّوَابِ
It is not permissible to do a job according to the
way mentioned in the question. Firstly, employment contract in this case has
been made for selling goods, i.e. if the employee sells goods worth 100,000, he
will receive 1,000 rupees and if he sells goods worth 400,000, he will receive
25,000 rupees (in the same way, there are cases of selling less or more than
it). Making an employment contract for selling goods is not permissible as it
is something beyond one’s power. Secondly, the condition laid down of paying a
fine because of a delay in instalment is also not permissible because fine has
been declared to be Mansookh [abrogated] and acting on Mansookh is Haraam
[prohibited].
It is stated in Durr-e-Mukhtar, Tabyeen-ul-Haqaaiq,
etc.
(والنظم
للتبیین) ’’لو
استؤجر بأجرۃ معلومة علی ان یشتری او یبیع شیا معلوما لا تجوز الإجارۃ لانہ استؤجر
علی عمل لا یقدر علی اقامتہ بنفسہ فإن الشراء والبیع لا یتم الا بمساعدۃ غیرہ وھو
البائع والمشتری فلا یقدر علی تسلیمہ‘‘
Translation: If someone is employed at a
fixed salary for buying or selling goods, this employment contract is not permissible
because he has been employed for doing the work which is beyond his power. It
is because buying and selling does not get completed without another person’s
effort and another person is a buyer or a seller; therefore, the employee has
no power to give the required benefit.
(Tabyeen-ul-Haqaaiq, vol. 5, pp. 67)
With reference to Al-Bahr-ur-Raaiq, it is
stated in Rad-dul-Muhtar: ‘فی شرح الآثار
التعزیر
بالمال کان فی ابتداء الاسلام ثم نسخ’ Translation: It is stated
in Sharh-ul-Aasaar that Ta’zeer-bil-Maal [fine] was [allowed] in the
early days of Islam but then it was declared to be Mansookh [abrogated]. (Rad-dul-Muhtar, vol. 4, pp. 61)
It is stated in ‘حاشیە شلبی علی تبیین الحقائق’: ‘العمل بالمنسوخ حرام’ Translation:
It is Haraam [prohibited] to act upon Mansookh. (Haashiyah Shalbi ma’ Tabyeen-ul-Haqaaiq, vol. 4, pp. 189)
وَاللہُ اَعْلَمُ عَزَّوَجَلَّ وَ رَسُوْلُہٗ اَعْلَم صَلَّی اللّٰہُ تَعَالٰی
عَلَیْہِ واٰلِہٖ وَسَلَّم
Islamic ruling on buying and
selling on an unknown profit
Question 2: What do the blessed ‘Ulama
state regarding the following matter: I am a cloth trader who employs the
following method: My maternal uncle purchases cloth from another country and
pays out of his own pocket. I buy that cloth from him on credit and it is
already mutually agreed that I will pay him its cost at which he has purchased
along with half of the profit earned after selling it. Is it correct to do so?
If there is a fault in this method, kindly tell us the solution as well.
Questioner: Muhammad Arshad Attari
(Markaz-ul-Awliya, Lahore)
بِسْمِ اللّٰہِ الرَّحْمٰنِ الرَّحِیْمِ
اَلْجَوَابُ بِعَوْنِ
الْمَلِکِ الْوَھَّابِ اَللّٰھُمَّ ھِدَایَۃَ الْحَقِّ وَالصَّوَابِ
Your act of purchasing cloth from your maternal
uncle in this way is impermissible and a sin, and it is a Faasid [defective]
Bay’ [بیع] [sale
and purchase contract]; terminating it is compulsory for both of you. It is
because the price of cloth is unknown in this method. You have fixed two things
as the price: (1) The price at which your maternal uncle has purchased the
cloth. (2) Half of the profit you earn. The profit you will earn is unknown;
therefore, this is a Faasid Bay’. Mentioning the conditions of the “correctness
of Bay’”, it is stated in Bada`i’-us-Sana`i’ [بدائع الصنائع]: ‘ان یکون المبیع معلوما وثمنہ معلوما’ Translation: One
condition of the “correctness of Bay’” is that Mabee’ (i.e. the thing being
sold) and its price is known. (Bada`i’-us-Sana`i’,
vol. 5, pp. 156)
It is stated in Muheet Burhani: ‘جھالة المبیع أو الثمن مانعة جواز البیع’ Translation:
Not knowing Mabee’ [i.e. the thing being sold] or Saman [ثمن] [i.e. the price at which it
is being sold] is an obstacle to the permissibility of Bay’. (Muheet Burhani, vol. 6, pp. 363)
Imam-e-Ahl-e-Sunnat, Imam Ahmad Raza Khan رَحْمَةُ اللّٰہِ تَعَالٰی عَلَيْه has
stated:
وکل شرط فاسد فھو یفسد البیع وکل بیع فاسد
حرام واجب الفسخ علی کل من العاقدین فان لم یفسخا اثما جمیعا وفسخ القاضی بالجبر
I.e. A Faasid [i.e. incorrect] condition makes the
Bay’ Faasid [i.e. defective] and every Faasid Bay’ is Haraam; terminating it is
Wajib [compulsory] for both, the buyer and seller. If they do not terminate it,
both will become sinners, and the Qadi should forcefully make them terminate
it.
(Fatawa Razawiyyah, vol. 17, pp. 160)
Its solution is as follows: Buy cloth from
your maternal uncle at a fixed price by fixing a time period [for payment]; for
example, if the cloth has cost him 5,000 rupees, you may purchase it from him
on credit in 5,500 or 6,000 rupees, agreeing to pay the price on the 31st
day. Whatever price is mutually agreed upon, it should be fixed and the date of
payment should also be fixed; then your act of buying cloth is permissible.
وَاللہُ اَعْلَمُ عَزَّوَجَلَّ وَ رَسُوْلُہٗ اَعْلَم صَلَّی اللّٰہُ تَعَالٰی
عَلَیْہِ واٰلِہٖ وَسَلَّم
Islamic ruling on selling
something worth a rupee at ten rupees
Question 3: What do the blessed ‘Ulama
and Muftis state regarding the following matter: Is it permissible to sell
something worth a rupee at ten rupees?
Questioner: Muhammad Mohsin Attari
(Markaz-ul-Awliya, Lahore)
بِسْمِ اللّٰہِ الرَّحْمٰنِ الرَّحِیْمِ
اَلْجَوَابُ بِعَوْنِ
الْمَلِکِ الْوَھَّابِ اَللّٰھُمَّ ھِدَایَۃَ الْحَقِّ وَالصَّوَابِ
[While selling things,] if there isn’t any unlawful
act (such as telling lies, deceiving others, etc.), it is permissible to sell
something worth a rupee at ten rupees with mutual agreement because the blessed
Shari’ah has not placed any limit on profit. Imam-e-Ahl-e-Sunnat, Imam Ahmad
Raza Khan رَحْمَةُ
اللّٰہِ تَعَالٰی عَلَيْه was asked: ‘Is it permissible to sell something worth four
cents at a double or triple price?’ He رَحْمَةُ اللّٰہِ تَعَالٰی عَلَيْه answered: ‘(This case and
the previous one) both are permissible provided that one neither tells a lie
nor deceives someone; for example, one says that something has cost him 4.25
cents after including all expenses but actually it has cost him 3.75 cents, or
he tells the correct cost but changes the selling item, so he has deceived
someone; these cases are Haraam, otherwise there is no harm in setting a high
or low price of something.’ (Fatawa Razawiyyah, vol. 17, pp. 139)
However, the appropriate way is to take the same
profit which people usually take because people less often buy something from
someone who takes a high profit and they also speak against him.
وَاللہُ اَعْلَمُ عَزَّوَجَلَّ وَ رَسُوْلُہٗ اَعْلَم صَلَّی اللّٰہُ تَعَالٰی
عَلَیْہِ واٰلِہٖ وَسَلَّم
Comments